ADD FAVORITES

 

BOOKMARK US




Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

RSS FEEDS

Get our news delivered directly to your desktop-free

Who's Online

We have 12 guests online

USER STATISTICS

681 registered
0 today
2 this week
3 this month

Visitors Counter

Today1408
Yesterday5830
This week18062
This month112201
All4104384
Data since November 3, 2008
1692 Newsletter Subscribers

Announcement

Dear Visitors,

Archaeology Daily News is an Amazon Associates Program member.You can buy archaeology related books securely at our Amazon Bookstore by clicking the Bookstore menu item on the vertical menu in the left of our webpages (Link: Archaeolody Daily News Bookstore).

Archaeology Daily News earns revenues from Amazon book sales.

We will make donations to UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund) for 50% of our Amazon earnings. We will publish our donations at Archaeology Daily News.

Thank you very much for your support!

Best Regards,

Archaeology Daily News



Debate Continues over growth of the Aboriginal population E-mail
May, 19 2011
 

This page is viewed 662 times

The Stone Pages

A great debate is under way following the use of a new mathematical model, which has been used to predict the growth pattern of the native Australian Aboriginal population, in the time prior to the arrival of Europeans.

The model's author is ecologist Professor Christopher Johnson of the University of Tasmania. His paper was accepted by the Royal Society back in April and is published online this week. He contends that the previous use of radiocarbon dating to predict population growth is flawed as it does not take into account loss of evidence from older sites. He claims that his mathematical model, developed in conjunction with Professor Barry Brook of the University of Adelaide, has allowed for this and he predicts that the Aboriginal population growtrh throughout the Holocene, was exponential i.e. increasing at an increasing rate, quoting a growth rate increase from 10% to 40% per 1,000 years, over the last 10,000 years.

One of the most vehement opponents to this theory is archaeologist Doctor Sean Ulm of James Cook University. He claims that the model does not take into account regional variability and that the research was focused on rock shelters, whilst ignoring settlements in open sites. What is certain is that this debate has a long way to run yet.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!

Related News:



Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

 

No comment posted

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.9 © 2007-2013 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev   Next >



Archaeology Daily News published 8530 news articles since November 3, 2008


MOST EMAILED NEWS

MOST COMMENTED NEWS

© 2013 Archaeology Daily News